From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aviles v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 13, 2014
134 S. Ct. 902 (2014)

Summary

In Aviles, the San Antonio Court of Appeals had upheld the admission of a blood specimen obtained without a warrant under section 724.012, which is referred to as a mandatory-blood-draw statute.

Summary of this case from Bernal v. State

Opinion

No. 13–6353.

2014-01-13

Antonio AVILES, petitioner, v. TEXAS.


Case below, 385 S.W.3d 110.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, for further consideration in light of Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 1552, 185 L.Ed.2d 696 (2013).


Summaries of

Aviles v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 13, 2014
134 S. Ct. 902 (2014)

In Aviles, the San Antonio Court of Appeals had upheld the admission of a blood specimen obtained without a warrant under section 724.012, which is referred to as a mandatory-blood-draw statute.

Summary of this case from Bernal v. State
Case details for

Aviles v. Texas

Case Details

Full title:Antonio AVILES, petitioner, v. TEXAS.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 13, 2014

Citations

134 S. Ct. 902 (2014)
187 L. Ed. 2d 767
82 U.S.L.W. 3404

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

1. The United States Supreme Court Has Not Decided Whether the Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule…

Weems v. State

Although this language is dicta, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals did recognize in Beeman that the implied…