From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avery v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 9, 1984
670 S.W.2d 585 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 47574.

May 9, 1984.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, THOMAS C. GRADY, J.

James E. Terry, St. Louis, for appellant.

Raymond Howard, Jr., St. Louis, for respondent.


Defendant appeals after the trial court denied its motion for leave to file an application for a trial de novo. We affirm.

This case was tried before an associate circuit judge on April 18, 1983. That same day, the judge entered judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $2,000.00. No notification of the judgment was made to the parties. On June 8, 1983, defendant filed a motion for leave to file application for trial de novo. This motion was denied on the basis of State ex rel. Weisman v. Edwards, 645 S.W.2d 732 (Mo.App. 1983).

The trial court ruled properly. Under § 512.190, RSMo. 1978, a party has 10 days from the rendition of judgment by an associate circuit judge to file an application for a trial de novo. The ten day period is absolute. Defendant did not file his application for trial de novo within 10 days of the judgment and therefore did not perfect his appeal. State ex rel. Weisman v. Edwards, 645 S.W.2d at 733.

Affirmed.

KAROHL, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.


Summaries of

Avery v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 9, 1984
670 S.W.2d 585 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Avery v. Bi-State Development Agency

Case Details

Full title:ORA MAE AVERY, RESPONDENT, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 9, 1984

Citations

670 S.W.2d 585 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Columbia Glass Window Company v. Harris

Since the running of the ten day period for filing an application for trial de novo begins when the associate…

Oliva v. Spatz

Fabros, Inc. v. Bailey, 695 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Mo.App. 1985). The Spatzes filed their application for trial de…