From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avent v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 12, 2019
1:19-CV-0830 (LEK/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2019)

Opinion

1:19-CV-0830 (LEK/DJS)

11-12-2019

REUBEN AVENT, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation by the Honorable Daniel J. Stewart, U.S. Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3. Dkt. No. 5 ("Report-Recommendation").

II. LEGAL STANDARD

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); L.R. 72.1(c). If objections are timely filed, a court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." § 636(b). However, if no objections are made, a district court need review the report-recommendation only for clear error. Barnes v. Prack, No. 11-CV-857, 2013 WL 1121353, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2013); Farid v. Bouey, 554 F. Supp. 2d 301, 306-07, 306 n.2 (N.D.N.Y. 2008), abrogated on other grounds by Widomski v. State Univ. of N.Y. at Orange, 748 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2014). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." § 636(b).

III. DISCUSSION

No objections were filed in the allotted time period. Docket. Accordingly, the Court has reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and has found none. The Court therefore adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety.

IV. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 12, 2019

Albany, New York

/s/_________

Lawrence E. Kahn

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Avent v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 12, 2019
1:19-CV-0830 (LEK/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Avent v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:REUBEN AVENT, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 12, 2019

Citations

1:19-CV-0830 (LEK/DJS) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 12, 2019)

Citing Cases

Avent v. Platinum Plus Auto Prot.

The other cases Plaintiff filed in this district are: Avent v. Filion, No. 04-cv-0302 (N.D.N.Y. filed 2004);…