From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Automatic Canteen Co. v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 30, 1966
26 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

June 30, 1966

Appeal from the Erie Trial Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Appellants-plaintiffs jointly asked for a declaratory judgment declaring that article XVII, sections 330 through 341 of chapter 7 of the ordinances of respondent-defendant City of Buffalo, requiring the licensing of certain vending machines, is invalid and unconstitutional. The trial court found that one section of the ordinance dealing with citizenship and age was unconstitutional and no appeal was taken from this determination. The court further found that this section did not affect the total constitutionality of the ordinance and held that the rest of the ordinance was constitutional and valid and dismissed the complaint. We agree with this conclusion. However, in these circumstances the court should not have dismissed the complaint but should have declared the rights of the parties, i.e., declared that the ordinance is constitutional ( Hoffman v. City of Syracuse, 2 N.Y.2d 484, 487; Rockland Light Power Co. v. City of New York, 289 N.Y. 45, 51; Matter of Mandis v. Gorski, 24 A.D.2d 181, 184). The trial court having failed to do this, the judgment appealed from should be modified by declaring that judgment be entered in favor of defendant.


Summaries of

Automatic Canteen Co. v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 30, 1966
26 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Automatic Canteen Co. v. City of Buffalo

Case Details

Full title:AUTOMATIC CANTEEN COMPANY OF AMERICA et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1966

Citations

26 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Hering v. Town of Canandaigua

It is observed that each of the parties is asking for a declaratory judgment. In the usual case it would be…