From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austen Ugweches v. Tatjana Nehhozina Ugweches

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 2010
78 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3675.

November 23, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura E. Drager, J.), entered January 21, 2010, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate or modify a judgment of divorce entered following his default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Austen Ugweches, appellant pro se.

Sanctuary for Families, Center for Battered Women's Legal Services, New York (Kara M. Bellew of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Concur — Gonzalez, J.P., Tom, Sweeny, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


While a liberal approach toward vacating defaults in matrimonial proceedings is warranted because of the important public policy of determining those actions on their merits, "it is still incumbent upon a party seeking vacatur to establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense" ( Estate of Allen v Allen, 258 AD2d 423 [19991; see also Gass v Gass, 42 AD3d 393, 396). Plaintiffs explanation for his decision to flee the country after being convicted of a felony, which resulted in his defaulting in the instant action, is not reasonable. Nor did he present a meritorious defense to defendant's counterclaim for divorce, or evidence otherwise warranting modification of the judgment. Accordingly, his motion was properly denied.


Summaries of

Austen Ugweches v. Tatjana Nehhozina Ugweches

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 2010
78 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Austen Ugweches v. Tatjana Nehhozina Ugweches

Case Details

Full title:AUSTEN UGWECHES, Appellant, v. TATJANA NEHHOZINA UGWECHES, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 23, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8622
911 N.Y.S.2d 350

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Wilson

Defendant then moved to vacate the judgment. Supreme Court providently rejected defendant's excuse for…

Wilson v. Wilson

Defendant then moved to vacate the judgment. Supreme Court providently rejected defendant's excuse for…