From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auriemma v. Rice

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
May 11, 1990
902 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1479.

May 11, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, No. 84 C 1224; James F. Holderman, Judge.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of judges in active service have voted to rehear this case en banc. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment and opinion entered in this case on February 6, 1990, 895 F.2d 338, be, and are hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc on May 30, 1990 in the morning session.


Summaries of

Auriemma v. Rice

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
May 11, 1990
902 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1990)
Case details for

Auriemma v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:JOHN AURIEMMA, DANIEL COLL, MARSHALL CONSADINE, RENALDO COZZI, KENNETH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: May 11, 1990

Citations

902 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

Baptist v. O'Leary

On those facts the Court of Appeals' panel majority found that Harlow precluded consideration of Rice's…