From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AUNE v. CAL LUDEMAN

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 8, 2010
Civil No. 09-0015 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 8, 2010)

Summary

granting defendants judgment on the pleadings on cruel and unusual punishment claims brought by persons civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, and holding that the Eighth Amendment does not apply

Summary of this case from Van Orden v. Myers

Opinion

Civil No. 09-0015 (JNE/SRN).

January 8, 2010

Nicholas D. Aune, Moose Lake, Minnesota 55101, Pro Se

Ricardo Figueroa, Minnesota Attorney General's Office, St. Paul, Minnesota, for Defendants.


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

AUNE v. CAL LUDEMAN

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 8, 2010
Civil No. 09-0015 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 8, 2010)

granting defendants judgment on the pleadings on cruel and unusual punishment claims brought by persons civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, and holding that the Eighth Amendment does not apply

Summary of this case from Van Orden v. Myers
Case details for

AUNE v. CAL LUDEMAN

Case Details

Full title:Nicholas D. Aune Plaintiff, v. Cal Ludeman, Commissioner, Minnesota…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jan 8, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-0015 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Van Orden v. Myers

due process of law," and by showing "an expressed intent to punish on the part of detention facility…

Orden v. Meyers

Plaintiffs' claim that the level of care and treatment provided constitutes "punishment," in violation of the…