From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auction Co. v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 26, 1958
148 N.E.2d 225 (Ohio 1958)

Opinion

No. 35333

Decided February 26, 1958.

Taxation — Listing personal property for taxation — Merchandise offered for sale — Person becomes a taxpayer, when — "Person engaging in business" construed — Section 5711.03, Revised Code — Merchandise acquired for sale between January 1 and July 1 — Taxable during year acquired.

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals.

The Schott Auction Company, appellant herein, was incorporated in 1947. During the years 1948 and 1949 it was engaged in the business of wholesale and retail auctioning of used motor vehicles and carried a small inventory of used cars. In 1949 it ceased to do business, and from 1950 to June 1954 it carried on no sales. During that period its only assets were office furniture and accounts receivable. For the years 1950 through 1954, it returned for taxation and paid personal property taxes on such office furniture and accounts receivable. In June 1954, it acquired an inventory of automobiles and again became engaged in the same business of auctioning used cars.

An audit of appellant's 1954 personal property tax return resulted in an increase by the Tax Commissioner of his assessment, upon a finding that the used car inventory held during the last half of 1954 was taxable in 1954.

On appeal from the final determination of the Tax Commissioner to the Board of Tax Appeals, the order of the commissioner was affirmed.

An appeal from the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals brings the cause to this court for review.

Mr. Bernard C. Fox, for appellant.

Mr. William Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. S. Noel Melvin, for appellee.


The question presented is whether appellant's used car inventory for the last half of 1954 was subject to personal property taxation for that year, under the last sentence of Section 5711.03, Revised Code (Recodification Act of 1953), relative to the listing of taxable personal property, the last half of which sentence read, "but a person engaging in business between the first day of January and the first day of July in any year shall list the probable average amount of personal property intended to be used in business by him until the first day of January next thereafter."

Appellant contends that the term, "a person engaging in business," as it was used in the above quotation, referred to a person who "becomes a taxpayer between the first day of January and the first day of July," since that phrase was used in the first part of that sentence; that appellant did not become a taxpayer between January 1 and July 1, but was a taxpayer as of January 1, 1954, and made its return accordingly; and that it should be assessed for the year 1954, not under Section 5711.03, Revised Code, supra, but under Section 5711.15, Revised Code (Recodification Act of 1953), relative to valuation of merchandise offered for sale, which provided in part: "A merchant in estimating the value of the personal property held for sale in the course of his business shall take as the criterion the average value of such property * * * which he has had in his possession or under his control during the year next previous to the time of making such statement, or the part of the year during which he was engaged in business."

With that contention this court is not in accord. When appellant ceased to do business in 1949 it ceased to be "engaged in business" as a merchant and until June of 1954 had no inventory and was not required to pay taxes as a merchant. The fact that appellant was authorized to engage in the sale of used cars did not constitute it a merchant during that period of inactivity from 1950 to June 1954. Its classification is determined by the actual operation of a business. Midwest Haulers, Inc., v. Glander, Tax Commr., 150 Ohio St. 402, 406, 83 N.E.2d 53.

In June of 1954, appellant chose to again engage in business as a merchant by acquiring a stock of used cars. Since this activity was begun after January 1, 1954, and prior to July 1, 1954, appellant then became "a person engaging in business between the first day of January and the first day of July," within the meaning of Section 5711.03, Revised Code, supra, and, as such, was required to pay personal property taxes on its inventory for the year 1954.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Auction Co. v. Bowers

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 26, 1958
148 N.E.2d 225 (Ohio 1958)
Case details for

Auction Co. v. Bowers

Case Details

Full title:SCHOTT AUCTION CO., APPELLANT v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 26, 1958

Citations

148 N.E.2d 225 (Ohio 1958)
148 N.E.2d 225

Citing Cases

Doraty Rambler, Inc. v. Schneider, Tax Commr

Where a used-car sales corporation closes down, liquidates its inventory, is out of business on tax listing…

Southland Stores v. Bowers

TAFT, J., dissents. See Schott Auction Co. v. Bowers, Tax Commr., 167 Ohio St. 321. MATTHIAS, J.,…