From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aubrecht v. Acme Electric Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

In Aubrecht v. Acme Electric Corp., 262 A.D.2d 994, 692 N.Y.S.2d 544 (4th Dep't 1999), the Fourth Department held that § 240(1) protected an architect who was injured while inspecting a construction site.

Summary of this case from Prats v. Port Authority of N.Y. and New Jersey

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., PINE, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Donald E. Aubrecht (plaintiff), an architect, was injured at a construction site while inspecting an interior wall soffit. He fell five or six feet when the scaffold on which he was standing collapsed. Plaintiff was vice-president of third-party defendant, which contracted with defendant Acme Electric Corporation to provide architectural design and supervision in connection with the construction of a manufacturing plant. The scaffold was owned and assembled by employees of defendant The L.C. Whitford Co., Inc. (LCW), the general contractor. Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging violations of Labor Law § 240 Lab. (1), § 241 Lab. (6) and § 200 Lab. and common-law negligence.

Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 Lab. (1) and denied that part of the cross motion of LCW for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff is within the class of persons for whom Labor Law § 240 Lab. (1) and § 241 Lab. (6) liability is imposed because his work was essential to the construction of a building or structure and he was employed by an entity hired by the owner for such purpose ( see, Nowak v. Kiefer, 256 A.D.2d 1129 [decided Dec. 31, 1998], lv dismissed and denied 93 N.Y.2d 887 [decided Apr. 6, 1999]; see generally, Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Dev. Corp., 76 N.Y.2d 573, 576-577; Lawyer v. Rotterdam Ventures, 204 A.D.2d 878, 879-880, lv dismissed 84 N.Y.2d 864; cf., Martinez v. City of New York, 93 N.Y.2d 322 [decided May 13, 1999]). Plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment on liability under section 240 (1) because plaintiff was injured in a fall from an elevated worksite ( see, Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509, 512-514).

With respect to the Labor Law § 200 Lab. and common-law negligence claims, LCW failed to meet its initial burden of establishing that it was not negligent in connection with the collapse of the scaffold.


Summaries of

Aubrecht v. Acme Electric Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

In Aubrecht v. Acme Electric Corp., 262 A.D.2d 994, 692 N.Y.S.2d 544 (4th Dep't 1999), the Fourth Department held that § 240(1) protected an architect who was injured while inspecting a construction site.

Summary of this case from Prats v. Port Authority of N.Y. and New Jersey

In Aubrecht, the court found that Labor Law § 240(1) covered injuries suffered by an architect who was doing an inspection of an interior wall soffit at a construction site.

Summary of this case from Adair v. Bestek Lighting Staging Corp.
Case details for

Aubrecht v. Acme Electric Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DONALD E. AUBRECHT AND SHARON ANN AUBRECHT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 994 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 544

Citing Cases

Prats v. Port Authority of N.Y. and New Jersey

Id. 747 N.Y.S.2d at 221. In Aubrecht v. Acme Electric Corp., 262 A.D.2d 994, 692 N.Y.S.2d 544 (4th Dep't…

MATZ v. LABORATORY INST. OF MERCHANDISING

"The intent of the statute was to protect workers employed in the enumerated acts, even while performing…