From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Au v. Republic State Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Feb 23, 2012
CIVIL NO. 11-00251 JMS/RLP (D. Haw. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 11-00251 JMS/RLP

02-23-2012

RONALD AU, Plaintiff, v. REPUBLIC STATE MORTGAGE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on January 31, 2011, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the Findings and Recommendation are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 23, 2012.

____________

J. Michael Seabright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Au v. Republic State Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Feb 23, 2012
CIVIL NO. 11-00251 JMS/RLP (D. Haw. Feb. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Au v. Republic State Mortg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD AU, Plaintiff, v. REPUBLIC STATE MORTGAGE COMPANY, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 11-00251 JMS/RLP (D. Haw. Feb. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

McAllister v. Adecco Grp. N.A.

First, absent waiver pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(d)(1), a plaintiff may not serve an individual or corporation by…

Lindberg v. Bush

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2). “The federal rules do not permit service by certified mail on an individual.” Au v.…