From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance v. Ash

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Oct 23, 1998
351 Md. 658 (Md. 1998)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG, No. 62 September Term, 1998.

October 23, 1998.


ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and John David Ash, Respondent. The Court having considered the petition, it is this 23rd day of October, 1998,

ORDERED by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, John David Ash, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Rules 1.3 and 1.4 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED that the Respondent's law practice shall be monitored for a period of one year by Charles E. Kountz, Jr., Esquire, who is charged with the responsibility of making quarterly reports to Bar Counsel concerning the Respondent's law practice management during that period; and it is further

ORDERED that the Respondent shall pay to the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland the sum of $492.75, for which amount judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against John David Ash.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance v. Ash

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Oct 23, 1998
351 Md. 658 (Md. 1998)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance v. Ash

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, PETITIONER, v. JOHN DAVID ASH…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Oct 23, 1998

Citations

351 Md. 658 (Md. 1998)
719 A.2d 980

Citing Cases

Brasher v. Brasher

Second, "the acquiescence rule does not apply where the right to the benefit received is conceded by the…