From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sud

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Feb 8, 2018
457 Md. 395 (Md. 2018)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 62, Sept. Term, 2017

02-08-2018

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Anuj SUD, Respondent


ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Anuj Sud, it is the 8th, day of February, 2018;

ORDERED, that Anuj Sud, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) and (d); and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Anuj Sud from the register of attorneys and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19–761, shall certify the fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sud

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Feb 8, 2018
457 Md. 395 (Md. 2018)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sud

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND Petitioner v. ANUJ SUD Respondent

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Date published: Feb 8, 2018

Citations

457 Md. 395 (Md. 2018)
178 A.3d 1240

Citing Cases

Linton v. Consumer Prot. Div.

Mr. Sud has since been disbarred. Att'y Grievance Comm'n v. Sud , 457 Md. 395, 178 A.3d 1240 (2018). Access,…

Linton v. Access Funding LLC

Mr. Sud has since been disbarred. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Sud , 457 Md. 395, 178 A.3d 1240…