From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the First Judicial Dep't v. Kelly (In re Kelly)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2017
155 A.D.3d 25 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

11-02-2017

In the Matter of Richard B. KELLY, a suspended attorney: Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Richard B. Kelly, Respondent.

Jorge Dopico, Chief Attorney, Attorney Grievance Committee, New York (Kathy W. Parrino, of counsel), for petitioner. Respondent pro se.


Jorge Dopico, Chief Attorney, Attorney Grievance Committee, New York (Kathy W. Parrino, of counsel), for petitioner.

Respondent pro se.

PER CURIAM.Respondent Richard B. Kelly was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 9, 1993, under the name Richard Brett Kelly. Respondent last maintained a registered address within the First Judicial Department. By order entered January 30, 2017, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 468–a, for failure to maintain his attorney registration.

The Attorney Grievance Committee seeks an order disbarring respondent, pursuant to the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters ( 22 NYCRR 1240.9(b) ), on the grounds that he has been suspended under 22 NYCRR 1240(a)(1) and (3), and has neither responded to or appeared for further investigatory or disciplinary proceedings within six months from the date of the order of suspension. Respondent was served with this motion to disbar by first class mail, certified mail return receipt requested, and by email, but no response has been received.

More than six months have elapsed since this Court's February 16, 2017 order of suspension 2017 WL 639622, 2017 N.Y. Slip Op 64550[u] [1st Dept.2017] and respondent has failed to appear or contact the Committee or the Court for a hearing or reinstatement. The basis for respondent's interim suspension involved, among other things, failure to maintain his attorney registration, pay registration fees, update his residential address with OCA, and failure to cooperate with the Committee's investigation. In light of the above, respondent should be disbarred ( Matter of Shedrinsky, 152 A.D.3d 132, 54 N.Y.S.3d 861 [1st Dept.2017] ; Matter of Yoo Rok Jung, 148 A.D.3d 1, 48 N.Y.S.3d 575 [1st Dept.2017] ; Matter of Jones, 148 A.D.3d 113, 46 N.Y.S.3d 791 [1st Dept.2017] ).

Accordingly, the Committee's motion for an order disbarring respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.9(b) is granted, and respondent's name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

DAVID FRIEDMAN, Justice Presiding, ROSALYN H. RICHTER, RICHARD T. ANDRIAS, JUDITH J. GISCHE, MARCY L. KAHN, Justices, concur.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the First Judicial Dep't v. Kelly (In re Kelly)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 2, 2017
155 A.D.3d 25 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the First Judicial Dep't v. Kelly (In re Kelly)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Richard B. KELLY, a suspended attorney: Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 2, 2017

Citations

155 A.D.3d 25 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
62 N.Y.S.3d 809
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 7698

Citing Cases

In re Croak

Although further notice to respondent is not required by Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters ( 22 NYCRR)…

In re Croak

Although further notice to respondent is not required by Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) §…