From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Gen. for Mich. ex rel. Dep't of Natural Res. v. Gelman Scis., Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 12, 2018
501 Mich. 960 (Mich. 2018)

Opinion

SC: 156373 COA: 337818

01-12-2018

ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR the STATE of Michigan EX REL DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Natural Resources Commission, and Water Resources Commission, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and City of Ann Arbor, Washtenaw County, Washtenaw County Health Department, Washtenaw County Health Officer, Huron River Watershed Council, and Scio Township, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GELMAN SCIENCES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Attorney Gen. for Mich. ex rel. Dep't of Natural Res. v. Gelman Scis., Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 12, 2018
501 Mich. 960 (Mich. 2018)
Case details for

Attorney Gen. for Mich. ex rel. Dep't of Natural Res. v. Gelman Scis., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR the STATE of Michigan EX REL DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jan 12, 2018

Citations

501 Mich. 960 (Mich. 2018)
905 N.W.2d 234

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

MCL 777.52(1)(a). Blake argues that, like the defendant in People v Temelkoski, 501 Mich 960; 905 NW2d 593,…

People v. Young

And," '[w]hen a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it…