From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jan 13, 1925
102 So. 828 (Fla. 1925)

Opinion

Opinion Filed January 13, 1925.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Putnam County; A. V. Long, Judge.

Judgment affirmed if remittitur is entered.

Doggett, Christie Doggett, for Plaintiff in Error;

Walton Dineen and C. H. Kennerly, for Defendant in Error.


Writ of error was taken by defendant below to review a judgment against it for $5,000.00 in damages for injuries to plaintiff alleged to have been sustained as a result of the negligent operation of defendant's train.

There is basis in the evidence for a finding of legal liability within the allegations for compensatory damages, but the amount awarded is considered excessive. If, within 30 days after the filing of the mandate in the trial court, the plaintiff will enter remittitur of $2,000.00 of the amount, the judgment will stand affirmed for $3,000.00; otherwise, the judgment is reversed for a new trial. City of Miami v. Firth, 85 Fla. 263, 95 South. Rep. 573; Lunham v. DeMerritt, 83 Fla. 708, 93 South. Rep. 148; Tampa Electric Co. v. Gaffga, 81 Fla. 268, 87 South. Rep. 922; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Oeland, 88 Fla. 122, 101 South. Rep. 360.

It is so ordered.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND WEST AND TERRELL, J. J., concur.

TAYLOR, C. J., AND ELLIS AND BROWNE, J. J., concur in the opinion.


Summaries of

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jan 13, 1925
102 So. 828 (Fla. 1925)
Case details for

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, Plaintiff in Error…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jan 13, 1925

Citations

102 So. 828 (Fla. 1925)
102 So. 828

Citing Cases

Southern Utilities Co. v. Davis

Florida C. P. R. Co. v. Foxworth, 41 Fla. 1, 25 So. 338, 79 Am. St. Rep. 149. See same case 45 Fla. 278, 34…