From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atchison v. Gulf Refining Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 22, 1949
174 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 12621.

May 20, 1949. Rehearing Denied June 22, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Wayne G. Borah, Judge.

Action in tort by Mable Atchison, wife of, and, Bosco Franicevich, against Gulf Refining Company and American Employers' Insurance Company. From a judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiffs appeal.

Judgment affirmed as to insurance company and reversed as to the other defendant, and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with opinion.

Sam Monk Zelden, New Orleans, La., for appellants.

Marian Mayer, New Orleans, La., Frederick E. Greer, Melvin Evans, Shreveport, La., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, SIBLEY, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.


This is an action in tort by appellants against appellees for the alleged wrongful acts of their employees. One of the appellees is sued as the surety of the sheriff, who was not made a party defendant. We agree with the court below that the surety on a sheriff's bond cannot be sued without joining the principal if the latter has not been sued, is solvent, and is accessible to suit; but the court not only dismissed the action as to the surety but as to the other alleged tort-feasor, who was jointly and severally liable, and we think this was error.

It is true that the appellants had the choice of forum and the right to sue the appellees jointly, but this did not deprive the appellees of their right to make separate defenses. When the separate defense of the surety was upheld, it warranted the dismissal of the action as to the surety but not as to the other defendant. We have been cited to no statute or decision which shows that there is any special rule in Louisiana on this subject, and the general rule is that joint tort-feasors may be held jointly or severally liable.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed as to the American Employers' Insurance Company, but reversed as to the Gulf Refining Company and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

Atchison v. Gulf Refining Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 22, 1949
174 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Atchison v. Gulf Refining Co.

Case Details

Full title:ATCHISON et al. v. GULF REFINING CO. et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 22, 1949

Citations

174 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Oil & Gas Ventures—First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. Kung

A different situation would be presented for consideration had Kung appeared in the Delaware action — a…

Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Browning-Ferris Mach

Also Texas cases: Muenster v. Tremont Nat. Bank, 92 Tex. 422, 49 S.W. 362; Woldert v. Durst, 15 Tex. Civ.…