From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atchison Homeless Shelters v. County, Atchison

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Oct 10, 1997
24 Kan. App. 2d 454 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion


946 P.2d 113 (Kan.App. 1997) 24 Kan.App.2d 454 ATCHISON HOMELESS SHELTERS, INC., Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF ATCHISON, Kansas, Appellee. No. 77599. Court of Appeals of Kansas October 10, 1997

       Review Denied Dec. 23, 1997.

       Syllabus by the Court

       1. Only four categories of individuals may appear in the courts of this state (except for out-of-state attorneys): (1) members of the bar; (2) graduates of accredited law schools who have temporary permits to practice law; (3) legal interns, who are law students supervised by members of the bar responsible for the interns' activities; and (4) nonlawyers, who may represent only themselves and not others in court.

       2. Kansas follows the common-law rule that an appearance in court of a corporation by an agent other than a licensed attorney is not proper since a corporation is an artificial entity without the right of self-representation.

       Rev. Don Lockhart, Patricia A. Lockhart, and LaChelle Lockart, pro se, for appellant.

       Leonard L. Buddenbohm, Atchison, for appellee.

       Before KNUDSON, P.J., and STEPHEN D. HILL and PAUL E. MILLER, District Judges, Assigned.

       STEPHEN D. HILL, District Judge, Assigned:

       Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc., is a corporation which has filed this appeal from an order awarding sanctions against it for filing a frivolous claim in the district court of Atchison County. No attorney has entered an appearance for the appellants in this appeal.

       Except for out-of-state attorneys, the Supreme Court recognizes only four categories of individuals who may appear in the courts of this state: (1) members of the bar who have licenses to practice law; (2) individuals who have graduated from an accredited law school and have a temporary permit to practice law; (3) legal interns, who are law students supervised by members of the bar responsible for the interns' activities; and (4) nonlawyers, who may represent only themselves and not others. State ex rel. Stephan v. Adam, 243 Kan. 619, 623, 760 P.2d 683 (1988); see State ex rel. Stephan v. Williams, 246 Kan. 681, 690-91, 793 P.2d 234 (1990).

       This means, therefore, that corporations can only be represented in Kansas courts by an attorney duly licensed to practice law in Kansas. Kansas follows the common-law rule that an appearance in court of a corporation by an agent other than a licensed attorney is not proper since a corporation is an artificial entity without the right of self-representation. Such a rule helps to maintain a distinction between the corporation and its directors and employees. See 8 A.L.R.5th 653, § 3. This rule was tacitly acknowledged in dicta in U.P. Railway Co. v. McCarty, 8 Kan. 125, 131 (1871), and U.P.R.W. Co. v. Horney, 5 Kan. 340, 347 (1870).

       Since Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc., does not lawfully appear in this proceeding, its appeal is not properly before this court, and this appeal is dismissed.

       Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Atchison Homeless Shelters v. County, Atchison

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Oct 10, 1997
24 Kan. App. 2d 454 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Atchison Homeless Shelters v. County, Atchison

Case Details

Full title:ATCHISON HOMELESS SHELTERS, INC., Appellant , v. THE COUNTY OF ATCHISON…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas

Date published: Oct 10, 1997

Citations

24 Kan. App. 2d 454 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997)
24 Kan. App. 2d 454
24 Kan. App. 2

Citing Cases

Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault

The small claims court dismissed the suit because Houser was not represented by or appeared through a duly…

Manufacturers Lease Plans, Inc. v. Front Page Deli, L.L.C.

However, Sagmani was not an attorney and, under Kansas law, a non-attorney may not file court documents on…