From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atchison c. Ry. Co. v. Moore

U.S.
Apr 6, 1914
233 U.S. 182 (1914)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA.

No. 451.

Argued February 26, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914.

Decided on authority of the preceding case.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. S.T. Bledsoe, with whom Mr. J.R. Cottingham and Mr. George M. Green were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. John B. Daish, with whom Mr. H.H. Smith and Mr. J.W. Beller were on the brief, for defendant in error.fn1

Argued simultaneously with Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson; for abstracts of arguments, see ante, p. 173.


The defendants in error brought suit in the District Court of Lincoln County, Oklahoma, against the plaintiff in error for damages, alleging that they were the owners of a certain race horse which had been shipped by them over the railroad of the plaintiff in error from Kansas City, Missouri, to Lawrence, Kansas, and which had been injured in transit. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendants in error, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma ( 36 Okla. 433).

It appears that the horse, for the injury to which this suit was brought, was a part of the shipment under which the horse in the previous case of Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson, just decided, ante, p. 173, was carried as therein stated, and that the facts relating to the shipment and cause of injury set forth in the present case are the same as those in the Robinson Case. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, after noticing the fact that, except as to the value of the animals, the extent of their injuries and the resulting damages, the two cases were identical in every material feature, followed the Robinson Case.

The present case therefore is controlled by the decision in the Robinson Case, and from what we have there said it follows that the judgment here under review must be reversed.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

MR. JUSTICE PITNEY dissents.


Summaries of

Atchison c. Ry. Co. v. Moore

U.S.
Apr 6, 1914
233 U.S. 182 (1914)
Case details for

Atchison c. Ry. Co. v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:ATCHISON, TOPEKA SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v . MOORE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 6, 1914

Citations

233 U.S. 182 (1914)

Citing Cases

Sommer Corporation v. Panama Canal Company

Nor does it remotely suggest that Canal Company either waived the various provisions or was estopped to…

Mobile O.R. Co. v. Jensen

The contract between the shipper and carrier is not the bill of lading alone, but the bill of lading plus the…