From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Astromovich v. Huntington School District No. 3

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 7, 1982
436 N.E.2d 192 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided April 7, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN G. McCARTHY, J.

Edward F. Hayes, III, for appellant.

Mark J. Hanlon for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 80 A.D.2d 628).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Astromovich v. Huntington School District No. 3

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 7, 1982
436 N.E.2d 192 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Astromovich v. Huntington School District No. 3

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER ASTROMOVICH et al., Appellants, v. HUNTINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 7, 1982

Citations

436 N.E.2d 192 (N.Y. 1982)
436 N.E.2d 192
450 N.Y.S.2d 786

Citing Cases

Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad

Thus, the net limitation period governing the action against Metro North and the MTA is one year and 30 days…

Mignott v. Nychhc

In short, due to General Municipal Law § 50-i (3), the waiting period in subdivision (5) of General Municipal…