From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Assicurazioni Generali Spa v. Garamendi

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 11, 2007
CIV S-00-0875 WBS JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2007)

Opinion

LANCE A. ETCHEVERRY (State Bar No. 199916), SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A.

FRANK KAPLAN (State Bar No. 50859), ALSCHULER, GROSSMAN, STEIN & KAHAN LLP, Santa Monica, California, Attorneys for Defendant John Garamendi, in his capacity as Commissioner of Insurance of the State of California.

JOHN GARAMENDI, in his capacity as the Commissioner, of Insurance of the State of California,

Gary Cohen, Deputy Commissioner and General Counsel, California, Department of Insurance.

ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI S.p.A. John Martini, Chief Executive Officer, Generali U.S. Branch.


STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI S.P.A.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AND MODIFYING JUDGMENT [Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54 and 58]

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

RECITALS

1. The Plaintiff in the above-captioned action (the "Action") is Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. ("Generali") and the Defendant is John Garamendi, in his capacity as Commissioner of Insurance of the State of California (the "Commissioner"). (Generali and the Commissioner are collectively the "Parties.")

2. This matter is before this Court on remand from the Ninth Circuit to determine the amount of attorneys' fees and costs to be awarded to Generali under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 as the prevailing party. See Gerling Global Life Ins. Co. of America, et al. v. Garamendi, 400 F.3d 803, as amended, 410 F.3d 531 (9th Cir. 2005).

3. Generali's moving papers in support of its fee motion were filed on May 22, 2006. The Commissioner filed an opposition on August 22, 2006. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and order of the Court, the Honorable Daniel Weinstein (Ret.) was appointed as a Special Master to report to the Court on certain issues relating to the fee motion in the Action, as well as in two related actions in which the plaintiffs were held entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs, Gerling Global Life Ins. Co. of America, et al. v. Garamendi , E.D. Cal. Case No. CIV. S-00-CV-0506 WBS JFM (the "Gerling Action"), and American Insurance Association, et al. v. Garamendi, E.D. Cal. Case No. Civ. S-00-613 WBS JFM (the "AIA Action").

4. In an effort to avoid the cost and delay associated with protracted litigation over the amount of fees and costs to be awarded to the plaintiffs, the Parties, as well as the parties to the Gerling Action and the AIA Action, agreed to mediate their respective fee motions before Judge Weinstein on October 7-8, 2006. Following the mediation, Judge Weinstein issued a mediator's proposal, in which he proposed that Generali be awarded six hundred fifty thousand dollars ($650,000) in fees and costs in settlement of their dispute respecting Generali's fee motion.

Generali, as a member of the American Insurance Association, also incurred a portion of the fees and costs at issue in the fee motion in the AIA Action. Such fees and costs were not included within the $650,000, and as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release concurrently executed by the Parties (the "Settlement Agreement), Generali has reserved, and not waived, its rights and ability to share in any fees and costs recovered by the plaintiffs in the AIA Action. Likewise, the Commissioner has agreed that it will not use the Settlement Agreement or this Stipulation and Order as a defense to or set-off against the American Insurance Association's claims for fees and costs.

5. Both Generali and the Commissioner have accepted the mediator's proposal, have entered into the Settlement Agreement, which adopts the proposal and other material terms, and are entering into this Stipulation to effectuate this agreed resolution.

6. It is the Parties' intent in entering into this Stipulation that the Order and the modified Judgment resulting therefrom be enforceable against and binding on the Commissioner just as any other post-judgment order awarding attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

7. Each signatory hereto represents and warrants that he or she has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to bind the party on whose behalf he or she signs and that no further act of board, entity, body or other person is necessary.

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, through their duly authorized representatives, the Parties stipulate as follows:

1. Generali and the Commissioner stipulate that the Court shall (1) enter an order to GRANT Generali's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs and award Generali six hundred fifty thousand dollars ($650,000) in attorneys' fees and costs in the Action; and (2) modify the Judgment previously entered by the Court to reflect this award.

2. Timely satisfaction of the modified Judgment (hereafter, the "Judgment") in accordance with the Settlement Agreement shall fully satisfy and release all claims for attorneys' fees, costs, and interest by Generali in the Action including, but not limited to, any claim for fees, costs, or post-judgment interest incurred between the date of entry of this Stipulation and Order and satisfaction of the Judgment (but as noted above, shall not impact in any way Generali's entitlement to share in any fees and costs recovered by the plaintiffs in the AIA Action).

3. Should this Stipulation and Order or any material portion thereof later be adjudged unenforceable, then the Parties agree that the matter shall be returned to the District Court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate to carry out the mandate of the Ninth Circuit in Gerling Global Life Ins. Co. of America et al. v. Garamendi, 400 F.3d 803, as amended, 410 F.3d 531 (9th Cir. 2005).

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Assicurazioni Generali Spa v. Garamendi

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 11, 2007
CIV S-00-0875 WBS JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2007)
Case details for

Assicurazioni Generali Spa v. Garamendi

Case Details

Full title:ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI S.p.A., Plaintiff, v. JOHN GARAMENDI, in his…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 11, 2007

Citations

CIV S-00-0875 WBS JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2007)