Summary
finding that in the context of Rule 68, the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdictional requirements
Summary of this case from Avila v. Watts Elec. Co.Opinion
Case No. 09-CV-2202.
March 3, 2010
ORDER
A Report and Recommendation (#27) was filed by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on February 12, 2010. More than ten (10) days have elapsed since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd, 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (#27) is accepted by this court.
(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#15) is GRANTED. All other pending motions (#21, #23, #25) are DENIED as MOOT.
(3) This case is terminated.