From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aschenbach v. Plainfield

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 22, 1939
8 A.2d 579 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued May 17, 1939 —

Decided September 22, 1939.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J.L. 598.

For the appellant, Joseph J. Mutnik.

For the respondent, William Newcorn.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Aschenbach v. Plainfield

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 22, 1939
8 A.2d 579 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Aschenbach v. Plainfield

Case Details

Full title:CARL ASCHENBACH, APPELLANT, v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 22, 1939

Citations

8 A.2d 579 (N.J. 1939)
8 A.2d 579

Citing Cases

Tzeses v. Bd. of Trustees of South Orange

Although, as was said in Lumund v. Board of Adjustment of Rutherford, 4 N.J. 577, 581 (1951), a property…

Stolz v. Ellenstein

It is urged there is a prima facie presumption that the power and discretion of the municipal boards have…