From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arzate v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 7, 2014
NO. PD-0091-14 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 7, 2014)

Opinion

NO. PD-0091-14

05-07-2014

FRANCISCO ARZATE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS


ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY

PER CURIAM. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

Appellant has failed to file copies of his petition for discretionary review as required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b)(2) and Order Requiring Copies (Court of Criminal Appeals Misc. Docket No. 13-004, December 16, 2013).

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this Order. Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Arzate v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
May 7, 2014
NO. PD-0091-14 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 7, 2014)
Case details for

Arzate v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO ARZATE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: May 7, 2014

Citations

NO. PD-0091-14 (Tex. Crim. App. May. 7, 2014)

Citing Cases

Ex parte Arzate

However, the PDR was struck and the redrawn petition was untimely. Arzate v. State, No. PD-0091-14 (Tex.…

Arzate v. Davis

Arzate's initial petition for discretionary review was stricken as untimely filed. See Arzate v. State, No.…