From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arway v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 6, 1993
618 A.2d 531 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14673)

Decided January 6, 1993


The plaintiffs Christine Arway, Arthur Arway, Dan Smith, Kerin McCormick and Christine McCormick's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 469 [AC 11057], is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether General Statutes 8-3(g) and 8-3c(b) require the decision of a zoning commission to be set aside when a decision of the wetlands commission affecting the same property is judicially determined to have been illegal?"


Jan A. Marcus, in support of the petition.


Summaries of

Arway v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 6, 1993
618 A.2d 531 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

Arway v. Bloom

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE ARWAY ET AL. v. WALTER S. BLOOM ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 6, 1993

Citations

618 A.2d 531 (Conn. 1993)
618 A.2d 531

Citing Cases

Arway v. Bloom

On the petition for certification filed by the plaintiffs Christine Arway, Arthur Arway, Dan Smith, Kerin…