From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arteaga v. Adom Rental Transp., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 22, 2014
121 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04046, Index No. 8826/13.

10-22-2014

Stanley ARTEAGA, appellant, v. ADOM RENTAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., respondents.

Linda T. Ziatz, P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y., for appellant. Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Colin F. Morrissey of counsel), for respondents.


Linda T. Ziatz, P.C., Forest Hills, N.Y., for appellant.

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Colin F. Morrissey of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), entered March 6, 2014, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3215(f) for leave to enter a judgment on the issue of liability against the defendants upon their failure to appear or answer, and granted that branch of the defendants' cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3012(d) to compel the plaintiff to accept their late answer.DP1

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In light of the lack of prejudice to the plaintiff resulting from the defendants' short delays in answering the complaint, the lack of willfulness on the part of the defendants, the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and the public policy favoring the resolution of cases on the merits, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3215(f) for leave to enter a default judgment on the issue of liability against the defendants, and granting that branch of the defendants' cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3012(d) to compel the plaintiff to accept their late answer (see CPLR 2004, 3012 [d]; Klein v. Yeshiva M'kor Chaim, 116 A.D.3d 672, 982 N.Y.S.2d 787 ; Schonfeld v Blue & White Food Prods. Corp., 29 A.D.3d 673, 674, 814 N.Y.S.2d 711 ; Yonkers Rib House, Inc. v. 1789 Cent. Park Corp., 19 A.D.3d 687, 688, 799 N.Y.S.2d 62 ).

RIVERA, J.P., HALL, AUSTIN, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arteaga v. Adom Rental Transp., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 22, 2014
121 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Arteaga v. Adom Rental Transp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Stanley ARTEAGA, appellant, v. ADOM RENTAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 22, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
993 N.Y.S.2d 916
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 7115

Citing Cases

Xu v. JJW Enters., Inc.

Here, the record demonstrates that the defendant met these criteria. Accordingly, the Supreme Court…

Stavola v. Bodd

The plaintiff appeals.Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its…