From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arroyo v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2009
63 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 2008-03278, (Docket Nos. V-19461-07, V-20985-07).

June 16, 2009.

In two related child custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Burke, R.), dated March 28, 2008, as, after a hearing, denied that branch of her petition which was for permission to relocate to Ohio with the parties' child.

Gina M. Scelta, Centerport, N.Y., for appellant.

Jeanne R. Burton, Ronkonkoma, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Dillon, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The record contains a sound and substantial basis for the Family Court's denial of that branch of the mother's petition which was for permission to relocate to Ohio with the parties' child ( see Matter of Tropea v Tropea, 87 NY2d 727). The evidence did not demonstrate that relocation to Ohio was in the best interests of the child ( see Matter of Said v Said, 61 AD3d 879).


Summaries of

Arroyo v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2009
63 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Arroyo v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JONATHAN ARROYO, Respondent, v. ABBY JEAN THOMPSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5120
880 N.Y.S.2d 540

Citing Cases

Ross v. Hodges

In relocation proceedings, this Court's authority is as broad as that of the hearing court, and a relocation…

In re Sheldon Antonio Steadman

each parent's reasons for seeking or opposing the move, the quality of the relationships between the child…