Opinion
October 10, 1995
Appeal from the Court of Claims (Rossetti, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the claimant's contention, the trial court's finding that he failed to establish that he suffered from a seizure disorder was not against the weight of the evidence. While the court should have granted the claimant's motion to reopen the trial to admit the results of a neurological evaluation (see, Matter of Village of Roslyn Harbor [Berger], 26 A.D.2d 936), upon our review and consideration of those records, together with the other evidence and testimony in this case, we conclude that a different result is not warranted by the facts. O'Brien, J.P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.