From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arroyo v. Garza

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Aug 9, 2018
NUMBER 13-17-00496-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2018)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-17-00496-CV

08-09-2018

SANDRA MARIBEL ARROYO, Appellant, v. CRISTO REY GARZA, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez

By one issue, appellant Sandra Maribel Arroyo asserts that "the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction" over this forcible-detainer action "because the question of ownership to the property remains unresolved, and the trial court is legally unauthorized to resolve land title disputes." Appellee Cristo Rey Garza has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on grounds that the issue presented here has become moot. Garza asserts that any questions pertaining to ownership of this property has been resolved in his favor. See Arroyo v. Garza, No. 13-16-00633-CV, 2018 WL 3583789, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 26, 2018, no pet. h.) (mem. op.); Arroyo v. Garza, No.13-15-00211-CV, 2015 WL 9487259, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Dec. 29, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Appellate courts are prohibited from deciding a moot controversy. See Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999); City of Farmers Branch v. Ramos, 235 S.W.3d 462, 469 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.) (noting that a court may only decide issues presenting "a live controversy at the time of the decision"). If a controversy ceases to exist or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome at any stage, the case becomes moot. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hallman, 159 S.W.3d 640, 642 (Tex. 2005); Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex. 2001). "[A] suit can become moot at any time, including on appeal, and . . . courts have an obligation to take into account intervening events that may render a lawsuit moot." Heckman v. Williamson Cnty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 166-67 (Tex. 2012). If a proceeding becomes moot, the court must dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction. See id.

The Court, having examined and fully considered appellant's brief, the documents on file, and appellee's motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that this appeal has been rendered moot. Accordingly, we grant appellee's motion and dismiss the appeal as moot. All pending motions, if any, are likewise dismissed as moot.

/s/ Rogelio Valdez

ROGELIO VALDEZ

Chief Justice Delivered and filed the 9th day of August, 2018.


Summaries of

Arroyo v. Garza

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Aug 9, 2018
NUMBER 13-17-00496-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Arroyo v. Garza

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA MARIBEL ARROYO, Appellant, v. CRISTO REY GARZA, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Aug 9, 2018

Citations

NUMBER 13-17-00496-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2018)

Citing Cases

Propst v. Propst

Mootness is a threshold issue that implicates a reviewing court's subject-matter jurisdiction, and appellate…

Propst v. Propst

Mootness is a threshold issue that implicates a reviewing court's subject-matter jurisdiction, and appellate…