From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Burge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 4, 2008
57 A.D.3d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503982.

December 4, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Jermal Arrington, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Carpinello, Rose, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur.


At the conclusion of a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of possession of altered items, possession of stolen property and unauthorized exchange. Petitioner exhausted his administrative remedies and commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and statements made by petitioner during the hearing ( see Matter of Freeman v Leclaire, 50 AD3d 1329). To the extent that contradictory testimony was given by other inmates, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Harvey v Woods, 53 AD3d 988, 988). As for petitioner's claim of hearing officer bias, it is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Vigliotti v Bell, 52 AD3d 1064). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Arrington v. Burge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 4, 2008
57 A.D.3d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Arrington v. Burge

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JERMAL ARRINGTON, Petitioner, v. JOHN W. BURGE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 4, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9503
867 N.Y.S.2d 707

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Yelich

In addition, a review of the record demonstrates to the Court's satisfaction that the outcome of the Tier II…

Nelson v. Yelich

In addition, a review of the record demonstrates to the Court's satisfaction that the outcome of the Tier II…