Arrias v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

Full title: Ronald J. ARRIAS, Petitioner, v. The IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 28, 1967

386 F.2d 191 (9th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 21054.

November 28, 1967.

Lloyd A. Tasoff (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., Charles Elmer Collett (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Steve Suffin, Atty., INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel, INS, San Pedro, Cal., Ramsey Clark, Atty. Gen. of U.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Immigration and Naturalization Service is hereby substituted as party respondent in place of the State of California and the United States of America (see Immigration and Nationality Act § 106(a)(3), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(3)). The petition must be dismissed because the petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by section 106(c). Rodriguez-De Leon v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 324 F.2d 311; Murillo-Aguilera v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 141; Mai Kai Fong v. I.N.S., 9 Cir., 1962, 305 F.2d 239; Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 139.

Dismissed.