From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aronov v. Regency Gardens Apartment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2005
15 A.D.3d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-02712.

February 22, 2005.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated March 1, 2004, which granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Leave to amend a complaint should be freely given ( see CPLR 3025 [b]) and is committed to the discretion of the trial court ( see Murray v. City of New York, 43 NY2d 400, 404-405; Estate of Horan v. Town of Smithtown, 282 AD2d 498). The exercise of such discretion will not be lightly disturbed ( see Nassi v. DiLemme Constr. Corp., 250 AD2d 658). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint to include additional factual allegations regarding the cause of the decedent's accident.


Summaries of

Aronov v. Regency Gardens Apartment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2005
15 A.D.3d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Aronov v. Regency Gardens Apartment Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROSA ARONOV, Respondent, v. REGENCY GARDENS APARTMENT CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 513 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 684

Citing Cases

Williams v. Kincaid

In addition, the Court of Appeals has held that OSHA violations cannot serve as a predicate for a Labor Law §…

Ramirez v. Guapo Bodega LLC

Plaintiff cross-moves for leave to amend the complaint to add a Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action against…