From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aronne v. Aronne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 25, 2000
275 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted June 16, 2000

September 25, 2000.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beldock, J.H.O.), entered December 8, 1998, as, after a nonjury trial, equitably distributed certain of the marital assets of the parties.

Stein and Stein, Mineola, N.Y. (Melvyn I. Stein of counsel), for appellant.

Van Leer Greenberg, New York, N.Y. (Valerie Van Leer Greenberg and Howard Greenberg of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in the equitable distribution of certain of the marital assets (see, Domestic Relations Law §§ 236[B][1][c] and [d]; Miller v. Miller, 128 A.D.2d 844; Majauskas v. Majauskas, 61 N.Y.2d 481; Wiercinski v. Wiercinski, 116 A.D.2d 789).


Summaries of

Aronne v. Aronne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 25, 2000
275 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Aronne v. Aronne

Case Details

Full title:SUE ARONNE, RESPONDENT, v. WILLAIM ARONNE, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 25, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 231

Citing Cases

Meza v. Meza

07 as her net distributive award; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without…