From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Porter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1896
25 S.E. 785 (N.C. 1896)

Opinion

(September Term, 1896.)

Practice — Controversy Without Action — Prerequisites to Jurisdiction.

When a case containing facts upon which a controversy depends is sought to be submitted under section 567 of The Code, an affidavit to the effect that the controversy is real, and the proceeding in good faith to determine the rights of the parties is a prerequisite to jurisdiction, and in the absence of such affidavit the proceeding will be dismissed.

CONTROVERSY without action, heard upon facts agreed before Boykin, J., at chambers, on 3 October, 1896. The affidavit required by section 567 of The Code was not made or filed. Judgment was rendered against the party named as defendant, and he appealed.

Shepherd Busbee for plaintiff.

S. G. Ryan and Armistead Jones for defendant (appellant).


It was intended, it seems, to submit without action a case containing facts upon which the controversy depends, under section 567 of The Code. It appears that the affidavit required by the statute, to the effect that the controversy is real and that the proceeding is in good faith to determine the rights of the parties, was never (124) made or filed. Such an affidavit is a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction in the matter. Jones v. Commissioners, 88 N.C. 56; Grant v. Newsom, 81 N.C. 36. The proceeding must be

DISMISSED.

Cited: Grandy v. Gulley, 120 N.C. 177.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Porter

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1896
25 S.E. 785 (N.C. 1896)
Case details for

Arnold v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:T. A. ARNOLD v. JOHN PORTER, RECEIVER OF PARK LUMBER COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1896

Citations

25 S.E. 785 (N.C. 1896)
119 N.C. 123

Citing Cases

Waters v. Boyd

CLARK, C. J. This is an action submitted without controversy under Rev., 803. This statute must be strictly…

Hudson Oil Co. v. Co. Commrs

It is evident that the case cannot be regarded as coming within the purview of Sections 89-1323 to 89-1325,…