From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Oct 24, 1994
19 Va. App. 143 (Va. Ct. App. 1994)

Summary

adopting panel majority opinion

Summary of this case from Duggins v. Commonwealth

Opinion

49981

October 24, 1994

In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Monday the 24th day of October, 1994.

Before Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Barrow, Benton, Coleman, Koontz, Willis, Elder, Bray and Fitzpatrick.

Gray Robinson (Jackson Robinson, on brief), for appellant.

H. Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.


On April 19, 1994, a panel of this Court affirmed Ruth Arnold's conviction of credit card theft holding that her prosecution was not barred by Code Sec. 19.2-243 or by her constitutional right to a speedy trial. See Arnold v. Commonwealth, 18 Va. App. 218, 443 S.E.2d 183 (1994). Ms. Arnold's petition for rehearing en banc was granted on June 15, 1994, and the mandate of the April 19, 1994 opinion was stayed.

This appeal was reheard en banc on September 22, 1994. For the reasons stated in the original majority opinion, the Court affirms the judgment of the trial court. Therefore, the stay of the mandate of the April 19, 1994 opinion is lifted. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with that opinion and its adoption by this order.

Judges Benton and Barrow, for the reasons stated in Judge Benton's dissent from the original decision, Arnold v. Commonwealth, 18 Va. App. 218, 225, 443 S.E.2d 183, 187 (1994) (Benton, J., dissenting), would reverse the conviction and dismiss the case.

The trial court shall allow court-appointed counsel for the appellant an additional $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel's costs and necessary direct-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the April 19, 1994 mandate.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia
Oct 24, 1994
19 Va. App. 143 (Va. Ct. App. 1994)

adopting panel majority opinion

Summary of this case from Duggins v. Commonwealth
Case details for

Arnold v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Ruth Arnold, Appellant, against Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Oct 24, 1994

Citations

19 Va. App. 143 (Va. Ct. App. 1994)
450 S.E.2d 161

Citing Cases

Robertson v. Commonwealth

Ordinarily, "'[u]nder Virginia procedure, a nolle prosequi is a discontinuance which discharges the accused…

Wright v. Com

See Moore, 218 Va. at 394, 237 S.E.2d at 192; see also Armel, 28 Va.App. at 409, 505 S.E.2d at 380 (holding…