From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnett v. Washington-Adduci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
NO. CV 11-5898-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Summary

concluding a "federal habeas court lacks jurisdiction to review the [BOP]'s individualized placement determinations"

Summary of this case from Turner v. Fox

Opinion

NO. CV 11-5898-JAK(E)

01-03-2012

TIMOTHY WAYNE ARNETT, Petitioner, v. ARCOLA WASHINGTON-ADDUCI, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice.

________________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arnett v. Washington-Adduci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
NO. CV 11-5898-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

concluding a "federal habeas court lacks jurisdiction to review the [BOP]'s individualized placement determinations"

Summary of this case from Turner v. Fox
Case details for

Arnett v. Washington-Adduci

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WAYNE ARNETT, Petitioner, v. ARCOLA WASHINGTON-ADDUCI, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

NO. CV 11-5898-JAK(E) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Fox

Accordingly, Reeb holds this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the BOP's discretionary, individualized…