From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 4, 2014
150 So. 3d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 1D14–924.

11-04-2014

David ARNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

David Arnett, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


David Arnett, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because petitioner's motion for modification of sentence was timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. See Jones v. State, 4 So.3d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ; Mathis v. State, 957 So.2d 692, 692–93 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ; Griffin v. State, 979 So.2d 1253, 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding that “imposition” of sentence by trial court under Rule 3.800(c) includes sentence imposed by trial court following reversal on appeal of denial of post-conviction relief, and motion filed within 60 days of such imposition was not untimely); Robertson v. State, 138 So.3d 1140, 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (following Griffin ). The circuit court's order dated February 10, 2014, is quashed and the cause is remanded with directions to consider the motion on the merits.

PETITION GRANTED.

VAN NORTWICK, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 4, 2014
150 So. 3d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Arnett v. State

Case Details

Full title:David ARNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 4, 2014

Citations

150 So. 3d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)