From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 22, 1895
31 S.W. 647 (Tex. Crim. App. 1895)

Opinion

No. 792.

Decided June 22, 1895.

Practice on Appeal — Statement of Facts — Filing of. — Where the court adjourned on the 18th of May, and the statement of facts was filed May 31st, no excuse being given for the delay, Held, the statement of facts can not be considered on appeal, because not filed in the time required by law.

APPEAL from the District Court of Victoria County. Tried below before Hon. S.F. GRIMES.

Appellant was convicted of horse-theft, and his punishment assessed at nine years in the penitentiary.

George F. Thurmond, for appellant.

Mann Trice, Asssstant Attorney-General, for the State.


Appellant was convicted of horse-theft, and sentenced to nine years in the penitentiary. The statement of facts can not be considered, because not filed in the time required by law. Court adjourned for the term on the 18th day of May, the statement of facts was filed on the 31st day of May, and there is no excuse given for the delay. Without the evidence we can not revise the action of the court in overruling appellant's application for a continuance. For the same reason we can not pass upon the appellant's second and remaining assignment of error, to wit, the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. As presented by the record, this judgment, must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 22, 1895
31 S.W. 647 (Tex. Crim. App. 1895)
Case details for

Armstrong v. the State

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ARMSTRONG v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 22, 1895

Citations

31 S.W. 647 (Tex. Crim. App. 1895)
31 S.W. 647

Citing Cases

Cannon v. the State

So far as I am aware, all of the decisions in all the appellate courts of this State, civil and criminal,…