From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Oct 4, 2024
No. 5D2024-0957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 4, 2024)

Opinion

5D2024-0957

10-04-2024

Raytaurus Armstrong, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Raytaurus Armstrong, Madison, pro se.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County L.T. Case No. 2013-CF-338-A, London M. Kite, Judge.

Raytaurus Armstrong, Madison, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

Appellant sought relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant appealed the trial court's summary dismissal of his 3.800 motion as successive. We reverse and remand with instructions for the postconviction court to either attach to its order Appellant's three prior motions and their accompanying orders pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)(2), or to review and address the merits of the motion. Our reversal should not be construed or interpreted by the postconviction court as indicating that we have determined, on the merits, that Armstrong is entitled to relief on his motion. See Jones v. State, 198 So.3d 920, 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

EDWARDS, C.J., and KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Armstrong v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Oct 4, 2024
No. 5D2024-0957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Armstrong v. State

Case Details

Full title:Raytaurus Armstrong, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 4, 2024

Citations

No. 5D2024-0957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 4, 2024)