From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armstrong Trading, Ltd. v. MBM Enterprises

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2003-09837.

May 23, 2006.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated October 3, 2003, which granted the defendants' cross motion to vacate a judgment of the same court dated October 19, 2001, entered upon the defendants' default in appearing or answering the complaint, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal amount of $178,737.60.

McBreen Kopko, Jericho, N.Y. (Regina Movsesyan of counsel), for appellant.

Calo Agostino, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Darryl T. Garvin of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Florio, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff's appeal from the order dated October 3, 2003, must be dismissed, as that order was superseded by an order of the same court (Kramer, J.), dated January 27, 2005 ( see Armstrong Trading, Ltd. v. MBM Enters., 29 AD3d 834 [decided herewith]).


Summaries of

Armstrong Trading, Ltd. v. MBM Enterprises

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 2006
29 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Armstrong Trading, Ltd. v. MBM Enterprises

Case Details

Full title:ARMSTRONG TRADING, LTD., Appellant, v. MBM ENTERPRISES et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4022
814 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Hilbertz v. City of New York

The judgments and the amended judgment grant the same relief and are otherwise substantively identical to…