From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armour and Company v. Cannon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 5, 1980
384 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Summary

In Cannon, it was found that after over two years as a forklift operator, the claimant was given new job duties involving much more strenuous labor.

Summary of this case from Skinner v. First Florida Bldg. Corp.

Opinion

No. RR-13.

June 5, 1980.

Appeal from the Judge of Industrial Claims.

Gwynne A. Young, Ernest L. Currin and Jeffrey A. Cramer, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith Cutler, Tampa, for appellant.

William D. Douglas, of Hamiton Douglas, Tampa, for appellee.


The self-insured employer appeals a worker's compensation order finding that the claimant sustained a compensable heart attack, and we affirm. After over two years as a forklift operator in the warehouse, claimant was given new job duties as a local truck driver. It is uncontroverted that these new duties involved much more strenuous physical labor; for example, claimant was required to personally unload, without assistance, approximately 20,000 pounds of meat daily. After several weeks of this activity, claimant began to notice some chest discomfort and sustained a heart attack within three months, which manifested while claimant was unloading a 65 pound box of meat. The record provides competent substantial evidence to support the conclusion that claimant's heart attack was caused by this physical activity, and the judge of industrial claims properly found the claimant's heart attack compensable as the result of a specifically identifiable effort not routine to the claimant's job. See Victor Wine Liquor v. Beasley, 141 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1962); Nationwide Utilities v. Hord, IRC Order 2-3746 (March 23, 1979), cert. denied, 381 So.2d 768 (Fla.App.) (Fla. 1980). The present case is unlike Richard's Department Store v. Donin, 365 So.2d 385 (Fla. 1978), which involved emotional stress without physical exertion.

Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Armour and Company v. Cannon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 5, 1980
384 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

In Cannon, it was found that after over two years as a forklift operator, the claimant was given new job duties involving much more strenuous labor.

Summary of this case from Skinner v. First Florida Bldg. Corp.
Case details for

Armour and Company v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:ARMOUR AND COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. JIMMY LEE CANNON, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 5, 1980

Citations

384 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Skinner v. First Florida Bldg. Corp.

In concluding that he had not, the deputy found that Mr. Skinner had been hired as a carpenter and was…