From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armbrister v. McFarland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 15, 2018
Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1211-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1211-B-BH

11-15-2018

BROOKE ARMBRISTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MCFARLAND et al., Defendant.


Pretrial Management

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim and Lack of Standing, filed May 30, 2018 (doc. 23) is GRANTED in part. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 1951 will be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 will be sua sponte DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. SIGNED this 15th day of November, 2018.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Armbrister v. McFarland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Nov 15, 2018
Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1211-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Armbrister v. McFarland

Case Details

Full title:BROOKE ARMBRISTER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MCFARLAND et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-1211-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2018)