From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arguedas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 1, 1987
509 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-1375.

July 1, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, R. Wallace Pack, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellee.


Defendant, Ileana Maria Arguedas, was convicted and sentenced for retail grand theft. On appeal she raises three points. We find merit only to her contention that, as an indigent defendant, she was improperly assessed court costs.

The trial court ordered defendant to pay $249.50 in court costs. While costs can properly be recovered from an indigent defendant, they can only be assessed after the defendant has been given notice and an opportunity to object to the assessment. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Word v. State, 451 So.2d 1026 (Fla.2d DCA 1984). The record does not show that defendant was given notice or an opportunity to object to the imposition of costs.

Accordingly, we affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence but strike the costs without prejudice to the state seeking to assess these costs against defendant after proper notice and hearing.

CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arguedas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 1, 1987
509 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Arguedas v. State

Case Details

Full title:ILEANA MARIA ARGUEDAS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 1, 1987

Citations

509 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)