From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arfield v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the Supreme Court properly determined, upon reargument and renewal, that they are not entitled to summary judgment. We note that triable issues of fact exist as to whether the appellant Grand Union Company caused or created the dangerous condition complained of by failing to properly dispose of plastic newspaper strapping material, and whether the presence of the strapping material was "visible and apparent * * * for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident" to permit the property owners' employees to discover and remedy it (Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837; Williams v. Southland Corp., 204 A.D.2d 717).

We further find that the Supreme Court did not err in adhering to its prior determination to grant summary judgment to the codefendant Rejoe Maintenance, Inc., since there is no evidence that Rejoe Maintenance, Inc., either performed its cleaning duties or was required to perform its cleaning duties on the date of the accident. Lawrence, J.P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arfield v. Grand Union Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1994
208 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Arfield v. Grand Union Company

Case Details

Full title:MARY L. ARFIELD, Respondent, v. GRAND UNION COMPANY et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 238

Citing Cases

Perry v. Cumberland Farms

Seism testified, however, that her statement was pure conjecture on her part which she based upon having…