From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arce v. Warden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 18, 2011
411 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7096.

Submitted: February 10, 2011.

Decided: February 18, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:09-cv-02248-CMC).

Rogelio Arce, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Rogelio Arce, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Arce's 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 Supp. 2010) petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arce v. Warden, No. 4:09-cv-02248-CMC, 2010 WL 3038626 (D.S.C. July 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Arce v. Warden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 18, 2011
411 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Arce v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:Rogelio ARCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI-WILLIAMSBURG…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 2011

Citations

411 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Dagley v. Johns

A federal prisoner challenging the execution of his sentence must exhaust administrative remedies before…