From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arcamone-Makinano v. Britton Prop., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 21, 2014
117 A.D.3d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-21

Amelia ARCAMONE–MAKINANO, appellant, et al., plaintiff, v. BRITTON PROPERTY, INC., et al., respondents.

Amelia Arcamone–Makinano, Elmhurst, N.Y., appellant pro se. Kushinick Pallaci, PLLC, Melville, N.Y. (Gina M. Wischhusen and Vincent T. Pallaci of counsel), for respondents.



Summaries of

Arcamone-Makinano v. Britton Prop., Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 21, 2014
117 A.D.3d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Arcamone-Makinano v. Britton Prop., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Amelia ARCAMONE–MAKINANO, appellant, et al., plaintiff, v. BRITTON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 21, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3644
986 N.Y.S.2d 372

Citing Cases

Keyspan Gas E. Corp. v. Munich Reinsurance Am., Inc.

However, a party may be precluded from offering expert testimony when there is evidence of an intentional or…

Elgart v. Berezovsky

The plaintiff contends that the court should have denied that branch of the motion because the expert witness…