From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arbitration, Am. Trans. Ins. v. Carillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 24, 2003
307 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1113

July 24, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered February 5, 2002, which denied additional respondent Empire Insurance Company's motion to vacate a judgment of the Special Referee granting a permanent stay of arbitration, and to dismiss the proceeding as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion granted and the judgment vacated.

Michael T. Altman, for respondent-respondent.

John A. Cannistraci, for additional respondent-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Rosenberger, Ellerin, Gonzalez, JJ.


Jurisdiction over a non-party to a proceeding to stay arbitration cannot be obtained by the service upon it of the notice of petition and petition by either ordinary mail or certified mail, whether or not such service is authorized by a court order (Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. [Markovich-Eagle Fuel Transp.-AJU Ins. Co.], 214 A.D.2d 734; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Perez, 157 A.D.2d 521). Once added to the proceeding by the court as an additional respondent, proper service could only have been effectuated on Empire Insurance Company (Empire) by court-ordered service of a supplemental notice of petition, and a supplemental petition, pursuant to CPLR 1003 (Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bohl, 262 A.D.2d 645, 646; Matter of Allcity Ins. Co. [Guy]), 97 A.D.2d 374).

In this matter, despite the fact that Empire was added as an additional respondent pursuant to two court orders, proper service was never effected pursuant to CPLR 1003 and, therefore, jurisdiction was never obtained. Accordingly, the judgment is a nullity.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Arbitration, Am. Trans. Ins. v. Carillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 24, 2003
307 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Arbitration, Am. Trans. Ins. v. Carillo

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ARBITRATION, ETC., AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 24, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 220 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
763 N.Y.S.2d 561

Citing Cases

Travelers Indem. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered January 18, 2011, which granted State Farm's motion to…

Oakley v. Albany Medical Ctr.

argued by the hospital, this was error with respect to Tri-Valley. "A court has no power to grant relief…