From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ARAO v. POLICY HOLDERS LIFE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jun 2, 1933
132 Cal.App. 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 4787.

June 2, 1933.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County denying a change of venue. D.M. Young, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Hugh Martin Young, Charles D. Warner and Thomas W. Hughes for Appellant.

Lawrence Edwards and Len H. Honey for Respondent.


[1] This case presents the same facts and the same questions of law that are presented in the case of Kiku Saito v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn., this day decided by this court ( ante, p. 412 [ 22 P.2d 724]), except as to the name of the plaintiff and the dates of the transactions involved; and, for like reasons as in that case given, the order denying a change of venue is affirmed.

Thompson, J., and Pullen, P.J., concurred.


Summaries of

ARAO v. POLICY HOLDERS LIFE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jun 2, 1933
132 Cal.App. 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

ARAO v. POLICY HOLDERS LIFE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION

Case Details

Full title:TODOME ARAO, Respondent, v. POLICY HOLDERS LIFE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION (a…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Jun 2, 1933

Citations

132 Cal.App. 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
22 P.2d 726

Citing Cases

Mahin v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association

MILLER, J., pro tem. [1] This case involves the same questions of law and fact as those presented in the…