From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Araiza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 18, 1925
268 S.W. 941 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. 9263.

Delivered February 18, 1925.

Burglary.

No statement of facts nor bills of exception appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar County. Tried below before the Hon. W. S. Anderson, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for burglary; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

No brief filed for appellant.

Tom Garrard, State's Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.


The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular. No fundamental error has been discovered or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Araiza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 18, 1925
268 S.W. 941 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Araiza v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST ARAIZA v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 18, 1925

Citations

268 S.W. 941 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
99 Tex. Crim. 305

Citing Cases

Bell v. State

Before a judge should permit a case to proceed under such circumstances, he should be very sure of his…

Moore v. State

Thompson v. State, Tex.Cr.App. 514 S.W.2d 275; Walthall v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 505 S.W.2d 898; Hernandez v.…