From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 25, 1987
504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-1931.

March 25, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; James P. Calhoun, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James A. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Defendant, a juvenile, appeals from his sentence for grand theft.

Defendant's first point on appeal is that restitution was improper. We disagree. See J.S.H. v. State, 472 So.2d 737, 738 (Fla. 1985).

Defendant's second point, which the state concedes, is that the written order should conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement of twenty-four hours of community service work and that the term of community control should be specified in accordance with F.R. v. State, 473 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We agree.

The cause is remanded for correction of the sentence in accordance with this opinion.

LEHAN, A.C.J., SANDERLIN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.


Summaries of

A.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 25, 1987
504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

A.R. v. State

Case Details

Full title:A.R., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 25, 1987

Citations

504 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

B.R.W. v. State

Based on the evidence and the trial court's oral pronouncement, we agree that the disposition order must be…

A.L. v. State

We agree. Since the letter of apology was not in the oral pronouncement, it must be stricken from the written…