From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aquavella v. Lamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 7, 1966
25 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

April 7, 1966

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and judgment directed in accordance with memorandum. Memorandum: A three-fourths vote of the entire membership of the Common Council of the City of Rochester was required to enact the amendment to the ordinance in question here to effect compliance with the provisions of section 83 Gen. City of the General City Law. Such a vote was lacking at the time the amendment was voted on at the Council meeting of August 26, 1965. While the complaint and petition seek a declaration only as to the meeting of August 26, in view of the extension of the issues by the parties to include the action of the Council taken at the meeting of September 14 and the consideration of those issues by Special Term, such issues may be disposed of by this court on this appeal. With regard to the action of the Council at its meeting of September 14, 1965 assigning complete accuracy to petitioners' version of the voting procedure followed it would appear a vote was taken on the ordinance for which reconsideration was sought and reflects the will of a three-fourths majority of the entire Council to secure its enactment. There being no issues of fact to be resolved and it appearing the allegations of the petition and affidavits submitted establish a proper basis for a declaration as to the validity of the ordinance as amended, the order of Special Term should be reversed and judgment entered declaring that the action of the Common Council of the City of Rochester, New York, on August 26, 1965 purporting to amend section 91-9 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rochester, New York, was invalid and ineffective to secure its enactment and further that the amendment to the "R-4" zoning ordinance amending section 91-9 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rochester, New York, was properly passed and enacted into law by the Common Council of the City of Rochester, New York, by a vote taken on September 14, 1965 and that said amendment is legal and valid in all respects.


Summaries of

Aquavella v. Lamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 7, 1966
25 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Aquavella v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:JAMES AQUAVELLA et al., Appellants, v. FRANK LAMB et al., Constituting the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Savatgy v. City of Kingston

Section 41 specifically covers only majority votes; to hold that it does not also apply to greater than…

Savatgy v. City of Kingston

To hold that a majority of all of the members is necessary if there is no protest but that only three fourths…